William Mike Warren, jr. convinced the FBI to hire Kelly Leigh Dickenson. He wanted Kelly to try to establish a telepathic connection with me in order to monitor the telepathic communications occurring between Angie, Laura Williamson Rexford (fb - https://www.facebook.com/laura.w.rexford?fref=ts ), Elizabeth, Mary John, Vanessa, Jennifer, and I. Mr. Warren could not understand why he, Kelly, and the FBI could not convince them to lose interest in me after all they were saying about me. The FBI had confirmed that we were telepathically connected harmoniously, and considered I may be controlling their minds as a result. Like others i presume, I viewed each one of them as being a great wife, someone who would be a blessing to have a family with.
Considering how we became telepathically connected, I did not believe there was any way Kelly would succeed. I loathe the woman's jealousy, and the injuries she was already intentionally inflicting upon my life. But not only did she develop a telepathic connection with me through FBI surveillance, she has been utilizing it to assault my mind every day since, try to brainwash me, and possibly murder me...while under the guidance, support, and praise of Mr. Warren and the FBI. Since 2003, it is the only thing she has done, it is the only thing she wants to do 24/7 besides eat, shower, and sleep. Kelly refuses to do anything else because she is fearful of losing the telepathic connection she has with me. Living with FBI agents off the taxpayer dollar, receiving concierge service at a upper-class hotel, she has been convinced that this is the only way she can survive.Some of the other telepathic abilities Kelly has developed during this time are to affect my heart rhythm (possibly cause a heart attack), keep me awake (sleep deprivation though she eventually needs sleep too), put me to sleep (or battle fighting it particularly when driving), choke me to the point where I am gasping for breath, and discern all of my emotions and senses as though they are her own. As I get older, I grow more distressed. Kelly tells me she loves her life, is going to be tormenting me for the rest of my life, I am her puppet, she will kill me if she has to, etc. The first woman in history to telepathically assault a man, she tells me that one day she in going to be famous.
Their motive - obstruct justice. Based upon their actions to prevent this case from being legally addressed, this case will result in multiple criminal convictions (according to the rule of law), and make me and anyone helping me wealthier at their expense. This case would have been legally addressed many years ago if the FBI/Justice Department had not interceded. Witnesses I worked with, played golf with, people that Mr. Warren, Kelly, and/or the Justice Department/FBI have spoken to about this case have tried to help me find an attorney. One attorney said I was a gold mine, another said I could name my price in a lawsuit, others say it is an easy case to win. One attorney I spoke with advised me that I can win the case myself or "pro se". These attorney's had all the testimony and evidence needed to win this case worth millions, not only for me but for them as well, yet declined to provide me with fair and legal representation. As evidenced by this case, the fear attorney's and law abiding citizens have of the Justice Department/FBI needs to be addressed and overcome.
Kelly tells me that no one is going to believe anything I write. I believe you eventually will if you have enough interest. Otherwise I would be foolish to write about these matters, post it over the internet for the world to see, and subject myself to a lawsuit, criminal charges, and appearing irrational or schizophrenic. Public statements enable all to respond to what is stated, and eliminates unlawful acts without legal accountability regarding what is stated. It's easy to determine that Justice Department/FBI involvement in this case adversely impacts their credibility and helps mine. I write from the perspective that there is nothing more that Mr. Warren, Kelly, and the Justice Department/FBI can do to me than they are doing already...if what I write is true. Please keep that in mind.
Even if you do have a hard time believing the statements
herein, or you have a hard time reading this for some reason, you could learn something about the laws in this country that could
prove to be invaluable one day. If we had known many of these laws and the U. S. Constitution more from the onset, I would not be in this position. These experiences forced me to learn in order to understand. In this case it has been far more enlightening to read the law and constitution than it has been to rely on a lawyer or any information received from the Justice Department or FBI agents. The addition of "ChatGPT" AI is a tremendous asset providing expert impartial legal advice.
How about it Kelly? The obvious method to prove me wrong is for Kelly to tell the world what she has been up to lately. Last time I saw her was in 1995 when I knocked on her apartment door in Jacksonville, Florida, where she was employed as an attorney. She refused to talk to me, and called the police. This woman who had been talking to my boss, people I was employed with at Southtrust Bank almost everyday, giving fraudulent legal advice about the FBI investigating me, and claiming she was going to marry me, accused me of stalking her. I told the officer to tell Kelly to leave me and my employer alone (paraphrased). It was the first time I had ever spoken to her ...since the few amicable encounters at or around the office of our former employer Energen Corporation. What has Kelly been doing since 2003, the year she quit her job in Jacksonville, Florida. Does she have a bank account? Has she been shopping, paid any utility bills, mortgage or rental payments, bought a car tag, paid any state or federal taxes? Is there any trace of her in society since 2003? Kelly tells me the FBI is going to protect her. 'Protect you from what' I ask her, a lawsuit and criminal charges that will incriminate Mike Warren, individuals within the Justice Department/FBI, and others previously associated with Energen Corporation also? As a result of the leadership Kelly is receiving from Mike Warren and the FBI, she reminds me of the behavior of Glenn Close towards the second half of "Fatal Attraction".We all should know the FBI, Justice Department cannot obstruct justice under any condition.
How about you Mike Warren? The absence of a response from you gives credibility to all of the statements herein. Please make your response public, as I have, so you can be held legally accountable as well.
Do not mistake me for one who is against the FBI described on the official FBI website www.fbi.gov. Our country needs these services.
 |
| https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/kidnap |
The statements herein are based upon facts, telepathy, intuition, common sense, and my opinion. I request all facts from the people who know the facts. See "18 USC 1512: Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant".. Specifically those of you I worked with at Energen Corporation, Southtrust Bank, and Compass Bank. Some of my neighbors through the years know a little, as well as some of the people that work(ed) at places I frequent(ed). Most people who attended Pine Harbor Country Club with me know about the FBI. The FBI knows. By becoming more knowledgeable of the state and federal laws pertaining to this case, as well as the United States Constitution, you are empowered to tell your side of the story without fear of being injured, oppressed, threatened, or intimidated. We all can profit a worthwhile amount, an infinite number of people can benefit in multiple ways. As a law abiding witness to this case, please help tell this story so the world cannot be deceived. Below you will see it is the lawful action to take, as long as you are honest. It appears the FBI plan on making public many years
from now an account of events that will not accurately reflect the
details of this case...when there is no longer any
threat of lawsuits and criminal charges against those they are
protecting.
I have utilized the "Freedom of Information Act" and "Privacy Act" to obtain all the information the FBI has on me. I received the response I expected to withhold evidence of multiple crimes committed by Mike Warren, Kelly among others previously employed by Energen Corporation. The file the FBI has on me that begins in 1994 provides evidence that my "rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution and laws of the U.S." are being deprived. Specifically, my fourteenth amendment right to "equal protection of the laws". To withhold this file from me is an "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE".
Note: Please select each document to enlarge
In the December 12th, 2010 letter, I misunderstood the term "defraud" and incorrectly stated that Kelly Dickenson was involved in a conspiracy to "defraud herself and others associated with Energen Corporation". What I should have stated was that she, along with the FBI, and anyone providing assistance to them, are in in a conspiracy to defraud me on behalf of some previously employed by Energen Corporation. They have defrauded me. They are responsible for me losing jobs at Energen Corporation (Alabama Gas), Southtrust Bank, and Compass Bank - and the reason I am no longer working in the career I love - Computer Science. It would not take long for an uncorrupt FBI/Justice Department to discover those illegally involved in this case.
 |
| Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act |
What is most remarkable about the responses from the FBI and the Department of Justice is that since the FBI became illegally involved in this case in 1994, they have informed many in the public that I am under FBI surveillance, an investigation is being conducted on me. Initially their focus was on anyone who could provide testimony regarding the numerous crimes committed by individuals employed by Energen Corporation. The illegal reason they claim to have me under FBI surveillance has absolutely nothing to do with me being under suspicion of being a terrorist (ref. above letter from FBI dated December 2, 2010), being on any government watch list, or committing any federal crime Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2516, Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2518. This case is not "classified", or a matter of national security. They arranged for my employers SouthTrust Bank and Compass Bank to monitor me through recorded illegal FBI surveillance in the privacy of my home and in my automobile by fraudulently claiming I was a threat to their security. In addition to increasing the number of witnesses dramatically, this enabled me to communicate with the people I worked with about this case and ongoing events. It also influenced/disrupted the work environment daily and led to my forced resignation.
While I was employed by Compass Bank (1997-2003) the several attractive women, very supportive and inspirational to me, were invited by the FBI to the hotel where the surveillance in my home was/is being conducted (they are renting the entire floor $$$$$$$$$). The FBI told them the invitation was to allow them to watch me in the privacy of my home in order to get to know me better since they, and by "they" I mean the FBI and the women invited, were interested in helping me get married. The FBI also informed them they wanted to study the telepathic connection occurring between us. These women were well aware that attorney's were saying that I would be rich. Four accepted the invitation. Three that worked at Compass returned multiple times. Another one (discussed below) decided to stay with the FBI for an extended period of time. Mike Warren received daily updates from the FBI. BadlandsTherefore, the two laws cited to withhold the FBI file on me in the letter dated "Mar 01 2011" are not applicable. The FBI investigation conducted on me has nothing to do with "law enforcement investigations or prosecutions". The "techniques and procedures" and "internal agency practices" have already been revealed to the public, primarily through the people I was employed with at Energen Corporation, Southtrust Bank, and Compass Bank.
According to the "United States Code Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 231" :
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 231 02/01/2010
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 12 - CIVIL DISORDERS
-HEAD-
Sec. 231. Civil disorders
-STATUTE-
(a) or
(3) Whoever commits or attempts to commit any act to obstruct,
impede, or interfere with any fireman or law enforcement officer
lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of his official
duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder
which in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or adversely
affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in
commerce or the conduct or performance of any federally
protected function -
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
five years, or both.
(b) Nothing contained in this section shall make unlawful any
act of any law enforcement officer which is performed in the
lawful performance of his official duties.
To be clear since day one of the FBI involvement in this case, the FBI has had all the evidence/confessions needed to convict several people previously employed by Energen Corporation of multiple crimes - excluding myself. The FBI has always been aware that I could win a lawsuit and press charges with this evidence. To obstruct justice, the FBI began fraudulently claiming they have the legal right to have me under surveillance, that I am a suspect of violating the law, and threatened to arrest anyone who provided me with the evidence needed to win a lawsuit and press charges against multiple perpetrators employed by Energen Corporation at the time. Therefore since day one of their involvement while I was employed by Alagasco (subsidiary of Energen Corporation), the FBI has never been lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of an official duty.
The FBI is currently torturing me, attempting to drive me crazy, and trying to brainwash me through the forced telepathic connection Kelly has with me. Kelly and the FBI have no verifiable alibi for her actions otherwise after 2002. I could be murdered as a result of the telepathic abilities she has developed over time. With her receiving FBI support, I cannot sever the telepathic connection. I have tried everything within the law and will continue to do so.
According to the "United States Code Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2340":
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 2340 01/03/2012 (112-90)
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 113C - TORTURE
-HEAD-
Sec. 2340. Definitions
-STATUTE-
As used in this chapter -
(1) "torture" means an act committed by a person acting under
the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical
or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering
incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his
custody or physical control;
(2) "severe mental pain or suffering" means the prolonged
mental harm caused by or resulting from -
(A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of
severe physical pain or suffering;
(B) the administration or application, or threatened
administration or application, of mind-altering substances or
other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or
the personality;
(C) the threat of imminent death; or
(D) the threat that another person will imminently be
subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the
administration or application of mind-altering substances or
other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or
personality
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 2340A 01/03/2012 (112-90)
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 113C - TORTURE
-HEAD-
Sec. 2340A. Torture
-STATUTE-
(a) Offense. - Whoever outside the United States commits or
attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to
any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be
punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(b) Jurisdiction. - There is jurisdiction over the activity
prohibited in subsection (a) if -
(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States,
irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged
offender.
(c) Conspiracy. - A person who conspires to commit an offense
under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other
than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the
offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.
https://www.fbi.gov/about/mission
https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights
If the FBI has spoken to you about me, you have evidence of a "color of law" abuse. As a law abiding citizen, I have the legal right to know about it. That information alone, that is, that I am under an FBI investigation, is evidence needed to legally address this case worth an infinite amount monetarily and will change the world as we know it.
Any reason the FBI provides to justify a legal investigation on me since 1994 is fraud "18 USC 1001: FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS". If the FBI investigation on me is legal, they would have spoken to me directly by now about the reason they have specified I am under surveillance. Why not?
Following are more federal laws that apply to the FBI's involvement in this case. I copied the following two laws from the FBI website https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/federal-civil-rights-statutes
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Conspiracy Against Rights
This
statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to
conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any person of any state, territory
or district in the free exercise or enjoyment
of any right or privilege secured to him/her
by the Constitution or the laws of the United
States, (or because of his/her having
exercised the same).
It further
makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the
highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or
hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
Punishment
varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if
death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
This law further prohibits a person acting
under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to
willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment
of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of
his/her color or race.
Acts under "color of any law" include acts
not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds
or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and
beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for
unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the
unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or
pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This
definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials,
individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home
Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws,
statutes ordinances, or customs.
Punishment varies from a fine or
imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or
if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to
ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include
kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an
attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall
be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for
life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
According to "The United States Code" (federal law):
According to "The United States Code" (federal law):
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 1001 01/03/2012 (112-90)
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 47 - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
-HEAD-
Sec. 1001. Statements or entries generally
-STATUTE-
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any
matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or
judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly
and willfully -
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or
device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the
same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years
or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as
defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or
both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B,
110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed
under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 872 01/03/2012 (112-90)
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 41 - EXTORTION AND THREATS
-HEAD-
Sec. 872. Extortion by officers or employees of the United States
-STATUTE-
Whoever, being an officer, or employee of the United States or
any department or agency thereof, or representing himself to be or
assuming to act as such, under color or pretense of office or
employment commits or attempts an act of extortion, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both;
but if the amount so extorted or demanded does not exceed $1,000,
he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one
year, or both.
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 1512 01/03/2012 (112-90)
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
-HEAD-
Sec. 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
-STATUTE-
(a)(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with
intent to -
(A) prevent the attendance or testimony of any person in an
official proceeding;
(B) prevent the production of a record, document, or other
object, in an official proceeding; or
(C) prevent the communication by any person to a law
enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information
relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense or a violation of conditions of probation, parole, or
release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force
against any person, or attempts to do so, with intent to -
(A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in
an official proceeding;
(B) cause or induce any person to -
(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or
other object, from an official proceeding;
(ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with
intent to impair the integrity or availability of the object
for use in an official proceeding;
(iii) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as
a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object,
in an official proceeding; or
(iv) be absent from an official proceeding to which that
person has been summoned by legal process; or
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law
enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information
relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised
release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is -
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in
sections 1111 and 1112;
(B) in the case of -
(i) an attempt to murder; or
(ii) the use or attempted use of physical force against any
person;
imprisonment for not more than 30 years; and
(C) in the case of the threat of use of physical force against
any person, imprisonment for not more than 20 years.
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly
persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in
misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to -
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in
an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to -
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or
other object, from an official proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with
intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use
in an official proceeding;
(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a
witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in
an official proceeding; or
(D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such
person has been summoned by legal process; or
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law
enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information
relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense or a violation of conditions of probation (!1) supervised
release,,(!1) parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20
years, or both.
(c) Whoever corruptly -
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record,
document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent
to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an
official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official
proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20
years, or both.
(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby
hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from -
(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;
(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the
United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense or a violation of conditions of probation (!1) supervised
release,,(!1) parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
(3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in
connection with a Federal offense; or
(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation
revocation proceeding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting
in such prosecution or proceeding;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than 3 years, or both.
(e) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, it is an
affirmative defense, as to which the defendant has the burden of
proof by a preponderance of the evidence, that the conduct
consisted solely of lawful conduct and that the defendant's sole
intention was to encourage, induce, or cause the other person to
testify truthfully.
(f) For the purposes of this section -
(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be
instituted at the time of the offense; and
(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object
need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of
privilege.
(g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state
of mind need be proved with respect to the circumstance -
(1) that the official proceeding before a judge, court,
magistrate judge, grand jury, or government agency is before a
judge or court of the United States, a United States magistrate
judge, a bankruptcy judge, a Federal grand jury, or a Federal
Government agency; or
(2) that the judge is a judge of the United States or that the
law enforcement officer is an officer or employee of the Federal
Government or a person authorized to act for or on behalf of the
Federal Government or serving the Federal Government as an
adviser or consultant.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution states:
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868.
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of
the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, due process of law; nor deny
to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws.
According to federal law, the Justice Department/FBI cannot arrest anyone for providing criminal evidence to an individual intentionally being injured that would enable him or her (injured) to pursue legal action. For threatening (to arrest) anyone who does, it is the individual(s) within the Justice Department/FBI that need to be arrested per statute 18 U.S.C. (s)242 - "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law". Please google 'false arrest cases' and discover how much you can be awarded as a result. Consider it a great opportunity for you to capitalize off an intimidation tactic by the FBI.
"The person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and should not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process". REF: https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights
If the FBI were going to arrest someone in regards to this case, it would be me.
I cannot find a case in the history of the FBI that spanned longer than seventeen years of 24 hours, 7 days of the week surveillance. The FBI has no charges to press against me after investigating my life and surveilling me since 1994. No one has any complaints to legally file against me. When there is no evidence of one committing a serious violation of a federal law, there is no legal reason for audio/video FBI surveillance Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2516, Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2518.
Therefore all statements the FBI make in reference to me, and they have subjected me to much of the same public contempt and ridicule that some of my former coworkers at Energen Corporation did prior to FBI involvement in this case, provides evidence of their involvement in a criminal conspiracy to defraud me and obstruct justice on behalf of Mike Warren, Kelly, and others previously employed by Energen Corporation. In this regard, people within the FBI and an individual within the Justice Department are defendants in this case.It is my objective for this case to be evaluated by an impartial, unbiased law enforcement agency that would address this case according to state and federal law, and the United States Constitution.
According to the "United States Code Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 3771":
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 3771 01/03/2012 (112-90)
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART II - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 237 - CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS
-HEAD-
Sec. 3771. Crime victims' rights
-STATUTE-
(a) Rights of Crime Victims. - A crime victim has the following
rights:
(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.
(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.
(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for
the victim's dignity and privacy.
Oh What A Tangled Web We Weave .......
Is there one person working anywhere that is - not needed?
Below is an article on "William Mike Warren, jr." from the September 23rd, 2007 "The Birmingham News" paper.
The May 20th, 2012 edition of "The Birmingham News" contained a front page article about the hospital nearing completion. Congratulations to all the engineer's, architect's, construction workers, interior decorators, painter's, laborer's, medical staff, Children's Hospital Board of Directors, Mike Warren, and everyone else who contributed to building a beautiful facility to accommodate family's and/or children in need of medical services.
To all the Mike Warren supporters, I am not trying to do anything differently than you would do under the same circumstances. There was a time when I viewed Mike Warren as a leader. Now, I view him as one of the most egotistical, narcissistic, corrupt human beings who blames others for the crimes he has committed, and encourages others to violate the law to help him get away with it. Every good deed he has done and will continue to do should be considered an act of bribery until he is held legally accountable for the crimes he has committed and continues to commit.
 |
Third Annual Message to Congress, December 7, 1903
|
According to Mr. Warren, we should not be treated equally according to state and federal law, and the United States Constitution. Mike Warren argues that others have violated the law and got away with it, therefore he should to. This argument creates a precedent to enable every citizen of the United States to ignore the law without legal accountability.
Would you give up your life for Mike Warren, break the law to help him get away with the crimes he commits? For one second would you allow him to invade your privacy, destroy your integrity, slander you, ruin your career, intentionally inflict mental and emotional distress upon you, threaten your life as he has mine? Do you pay your taxes to prevent this man from being sued, to help him get away with the crimes he commits? Mike Warren is responsible for spending your tax dollars (estimate over 100 million so far) so he can hang on to his relative fortune (this case would have been settled for far less during my employment at Alagasco). With all the help he receives Mike Warren believes - he is a good business man - he is worth it - he is above the law - accomplished too much for "we the people" in the form of a judge and and jury to convict him and thereby suffer the consequences of his actions. So does his friend(s) who currently/previously work(ed) for the Department of Justice. Someone he got to know while working as an attorney for the Bradley, Arant, Rose, & White Law Firm for a dozen years I concluded. Let's argue this case in a court of law Mike Warren. When I was employed by Compass Bank, Mike Warren contacted his friend in the Justice Department after a complaint was made to the Justice Department by my department head about the FBI daily interference in the work environment. Mike Warren convinced his friend to order the FBI to get him "off the hook" in regards to his illegal involvement in this case, and to order the FBI to obey his orders. In their opinion, it is "the greater good". An opinion based on what can only be speculation, bribery, and/or extortion (as defined below under §13A-8-15 Extortion in the Second Degree, §13A-8-1(14) THREAT. A menace, however communicated, to: g. Reveal any information sought to be concealed by the person threatened - 2021 The Code of Alabama".
There are some FBI agents who now consider their involvement in this case a waste of taxpayer dollars. This case provides an example of the FBI believing it is more important to follow the orders of a lawless individual employed by the Justice Department than it is to follow state/federal law and the United States Constitution.
"2021 The Code of Alabama" (Alabama Law) states:
Section 13A-10-61
Bribery of public servants.
(a) A person commits the crime of bribery if:
(1) He offers, confers or agrees to confer any thing of value upon a public servant with the intent that the public servant's vote, opinion, judgment, exercise of discretion or other action in his official capacity will thereby be corruptly influenced; or
(2) While a public servant, he solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any pecuniary benefit upon an agreement or understanding that his vote, opinion, judgment, exercise of discretion or other action as a public servant will thereby be corruptly influenced.
(b) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person sought to be influenced was not qualified to act in the desired way, whether because he had not yet assumed office, lacked jurisdiction or for any other reason.
(c) Bribery is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or min. 1 year 1 day, with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offence).
Regarding "misuse of a public office for personal gain" -
https://www.justice.gov/jmd/misuse-position-and-government-resources
Mike Warren believes the more people he can corrupt, the more people
that have motive to prevent a legal resolution. Roger Dubble, former Energen VP of Information Services is responsible for initiating the FBI surveillance on me in 1994 to obstruct justice, but Mike Warren is responsible for keeping me under FBI surveillance. With evidence of FBI corruption, he told the FBI 'if I am going down, I am taking the FBI down with me; the #&&! will hit the fan' - 18 U.S.C. § 873 Blackmail, 18 U.S.C. § 1001 Fraud and False Statements, 18 U.S.C. § 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States, 18 U.S.C. § 1510 Obstruction of Criminal Investigations.
Liberty and Justice For All
I have set up a "facebook" page under the same title "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness". This site is intended to be used as a communication platform for this blog. Profanity has been restricted. Hopefully it will generate opinions from around the world about this case and provide a place for everyone to share similar stories. The FBI, America's civil servants, has stated this case is historical in multiple respects. Yet the FBI/Justice Department have kept these revelations a secret due to the illegal nature of Mike Warren and Kelly's involvement in this case, among others, including their own.
I do not want anyone to be deceived. To those of you who have knowledge to confirm or deny my statements, this is a great place to set the record straight.
If Mike Warren, Kelly, Energen Corporation representatives, the FBI, the Justice Department, or anyone else wants the world to know something about me, or about this case, this is a great place to inform them.
Please include the "TITLE", "Chapter", and "Section" of the law when applicable. Considering I have had no privacy since approximately 1984, one would think those responsible for the surveillance believe there is something about me worth watching. The statements within explain the reason for the surveillance from my perspective. I hope those aware of the surveillance through the years will publicly provide the reason for the surveillance from their perspective. Certainly all men and women will agree that if illegal surveillance was being conducted upon you, then you would expect all who know to inform you also. Per laws referenced herein, all of us ignorant of Alabama and federal law through the years can now understand how illegal it is.
Hopefully this page will unite us all against tyranny and generate legal accountability. Please spread the word.
There have been millions before us, and that are currently in a struggle for survival around the world. Perhaps they, and others have not been, or are not in an environment that enabled the discovery of their telepathic ability. In their efforts to determine who my contact was, the FBI created such an environment for me, along with others involved in this case. We have learned that telepathy can be used for the "greater good" of all, and in Kelly's case, for illegal reasons.REF: Why are individuals so different from on another?
This story is incomplete and more difficult to understand without enough corroboration. Inaccuracies need to be addressed and eliminated. As previously mentioned, there are many who can corroborate this story in varying respects. I lived in what could be compared to an aquarium during my working days at Alagasco, Southtrust Bank, and Compass Bank. As a result there are many with testimony regarding the involvement of Kelly, Mike Warren, the FBI, and the telepathy. Naturally they have moved on with their lives.
When Mike Warren orchestrated my termination from my last programming job at Compass Bank in March, 2003, I had placed my life into the hands of Jennifer Lynn Connelly. Yes, the movie actress. Jennifer became involved as a result of the FBI conducting a test regarding the observed telepathy, and additional obvious reasons as well. Jennifer became quite the topic of conversation to many at Compass Bank for the role she was playing in helping me get this case legally addressed, and the relationships she created with some of the people at Compass Bank and the FBI during 2002. Mike Warren told Jennifer, this is not a movie without real consequences. Upon returning home I responded the same to Mike Warren. Jennifer had her attorney involved in the case with all the evidence he needed to win a lawsuit he determined to be worth one-hundred million dollars. Jennifer refused to give him her approval to file the lawsuit. She got caught up in .......... some other activities, got pregnant and engaged to Paul Bettany. I let Jennifer know that I wanted her to be completely happy regardless of who she married. Even after these developments, and the FBI trying to convince her not to, Jennifer emphatically maintained that she was still going to help get this case legally addressed - when she was ready. I was somewhat complacent for a while due to her proclaimed interest in the case and me, less so as the years passed and Kelly's telepathic abilities began to grow more torturous.
Committing a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant, Kelly, Mike Warren, and the FBI tell me that I am putting a lot of pressure on Jennifer and witnesses by asking them to come forward with their testimony. Statements like this make me wonder 'how many people have succumbed to their oppressive intimidation tactics over the years?'. Jennifer may have changed her mind for this reason. Pressure? All a witness has to do is cooperate with the FBI, do and say whatever they want you to do and say regardless of legalities. BUT consider - from my experiences the way the world works is people are held accountable for their actions/inaction in many respects. When one compromises our laws and constitution, one may become subservient to those aware, and endanger one's ability (including the FBI) to be protected by law and the constitution in one's time of need.
This story is incomplete and more difficult to understand without enough corroboration. Inaccuracies need to be addressed and eliminated. As previously mentioned, there are many who can corroborate this story in varying respects. I lived in what could be compared to an aquarium during my working days at Alagasco, Southtrust Bank, and Compass Bank. As a result there are many with testimony regarding the involvement of Kelly, Mike Warren, the FBI, and the telepathy. Naturally they have moved on with their lives.
When Mike Warren orchestrated my termination from my last programming job at Compass Bank in March, 2003, I had placed my life into the hands of Jennifer Lynn Connelly. Yes, the movie actress. Jennifer became involved as a result of the FBI conducting a test regarding the observed telepathy, and additional obvious reasons as well. Jennifer became quite the topic of conversation to many at Compass Bank for the role she was playing in helping me get this case legally addressed, and the relationships she created with some of the people at Compass Bank and the FBI during 2002. Mike Warren told Jennifer, this is not a movie without real consequences. Upon returning home I responded the same to Mike Warren. Jennifer had her attorney involved in the case with all the evidence he needed to win a lawsuit he determined to be worth one-hundred million dollars. Jennifer refused to give him her approval to file the lawsuit. She got caught up in .......... some other activities, got pregnant and engaged to Paul Bettany. I let Jennifer know that I wanted her to be completely happy regardless of who she married. Even after these developments, and the FBI trying to convince her not to, Jennifer emphatically maintained that she was still going to help get this case legally addressed - when she was ready. I was somewhat complacent for a while due to her proclaimed interest in the case and me, less so as the years passed and Kelly's telepathic abilities began to grow more torturous.
Committing a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant, Kelly, Mike Warren, and the FBI tell me that I am putting a lot of pressure on Jennifer and witnesses by asking them to come forward with their testimony. Statements like this make me wonder 'how many people have succumbed to their oppressive intimidation tactics over the years?'. Jennifer may have changed her mind for this reason. Pressure? All a witness has to do is cooperate with the FBI, do and say whatever they want you to do and say regardless of legalities. BUT consider - from my experiences the way the world works is people are held accountable for their actions/inaction in many respects. When one compromises our laws and constitution, one may become subservient to those aware, and endanger one's ability (including the FBI) to be protected by law and the constitution in one's time of need.
In addition to federal law "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE" 18 U.S.C. 1512, Alabama law ("§13A-10-121 thru 124 - 2021 The Code of Alabama") states:
Section
13A-10-121
Bribing a witness.
(a) A person commits the crime of bribing a witness if he offers, confers or agrees to confer any thing of value upon a witness or a person he believes will be called as a witness in any official proceeding with intent to:
(1) Corruptly
influence the testimony of that person;
(2) Induce
that person to avoid legal process summoning him to testify; or
(3) Induce
that person to absent himself from an official proceeding to which he has been
legally summoned.
(b) This
section does not apply to the payment of additional compensation to an expert
witness over and above the amount otherwise prescribed by law to be paid a
witness.
(c) Bribing a
witness is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or min. 1 year 1
day with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any amount not exceeding
double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the
commission of the offence).
Section 13A-10-122
Bribe receiving by a witness.
(a) A witness or a person believing he will be called as a witness in any official proceeding commits the crime of bribe receiving by a witness if he solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any thing of value upon an agreement or understanding that:
(1) His
testimony will thereby be corruptly influenced;
(2) He will
attempt to avoid legal process summoning him to testify; or
(3) He will
attempt to absent himself from an official proceeding to which he has been
legally summoned.
(b) This
section does not apply to the payment of additional compensation to an expert
witness over and above the amount otherwise prescribed by law to be paid to a
witness.
(c) Bribe
receiving by a witness is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or
min. 1 year 1 day, with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any
amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the
victim caused by the commission of the offence).
Section 13A-10-123
Intimidating a witness.
(a) A person commits the crime of intimidating a witness if he attempts, by use of a threat directed to a witness or a person he believes will be called as a witness in any official proceedings, to:
(1) Corruptly
influence the testimony of that person;
(2) Induce
that person to avoid legal process summoning him to testify; or
(3) Induce
that person to absent himself from an official proceeding to which he has been
legally summoned.
(b)
"Threat," as used in this section, means any threat proscribed by Section
13A-6-25 on criminal coercion.
(c)
Intimidating a witness is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or
min. 1 year 1 day, with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any
amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the
victim caused by the commission of the offence) .
Section 13A-10-124
Tampering with a witness.
(a) A person commits the crime of tampering with a witness if he attempts to induce a witness or a person he believes will be called as a witness in any official proceeding to:
(1) Testify
falsely or unlawfully withhold testimony; or
(2) Absent
himself from any official proceeding to which he has been legally summoned.
(b) Tampering
with a witness is a Class B misdemeanor (max. six months imprisonment or
hard labor, not more than $3000.00 fine).
As of 2018, data indicates there are over three-hundred and twenty-seven million United States citizens. Our country has fought and sacrificed lives to eradicate oppression and injustice in other countries. Working together we can eradicate it in our own.
The facebook page "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" also enables people in our country and around the world to communicate to the witnesses involved in this case. Your statements can be hypothetical, theoretical, your opinion.
If you think I am crazy, irrational, in "The Twilight Zone", etc. - let me know.
Please comment on the following also:
- Should the FBI inform the world about the existence of telepathy and the impact it has already demonstrated. The FBI is currently using telepathy against me in order to accomplish a specific objective. Who is next?
- Do you consider the existence of telepathy newsworthy, historical, a step in human evolution, or any relevance whatsoever?
- What effect would telepathy have around the world if more/all developed a telepathic ability to affect/effect another?
- Should textbooks be updated, doctors made aware of the existence of telepathy and the medical affect/effect it can have on another?
- Should research be conducted, technology created to identify telepathic vs non-telepathic affects/effects?
- Would you be interested in reading a book about this story, perhaps even a movie about it? Again, Kelly is thrilled to be told by the FBI that she will make history regarding her telepathic abilities. There were several others the FBI identified as telepathic before her. If the rest of the world is half as fascinated by this case as the revolving door of FBI agents and other witnesses have been, we can capitalize a more than worthwhile amount. Surely one day in the future some will capitalize off this story. May as well be us now. Doing so will send a strong message to discourage future injury, oppression, threats, or intimidation in our society.
Do not consider anything the Justice Department/FBI says about this case as credible until this case is addressed in a court of law, or publicly so I can respond. Demand to see a warrant! Demand they talk directly to me about their allegations! Please document or record everything they say so it can be used in a court of law. However anyone, including attorney's and the FBI, may try to convince you to withhold evidence of a violation of the law in this case, they are criminally coercing you to ignore the law and the United States Constitution. The legal response is to file a report with your local sheriffs/police department, get a copy of it, and make sure your district attorney is notified (U. S. District Attorney for federal law violations, County District Attorney for state law violations). Obtain written correspondence from any city, state, and federal government officials, as well as anyone currently/previously associated with Energen Corporation. Inform your senator, congressman, local representative. Refer everyone to this blog so that I can be held legally accountable. Publicize everything pertaining to the case. Our civil servants work for you, are paid by you. Get involved! Tell all family members, friends, neighbors, strangers. Spread the word. Together we all can obtain legal restitution(compensation) for any mental or emotional duress, pain and suffering, or any other injury should one occur.
Our honesty will have infinite dividends.
To the world -
Please advise and support the witnesses involved in this case if you wish truth and justice to prevail. Make your comments on the facebook page where we can all be united against tyranny.
The FBI cannot arrest millions seeking a legal resolution to a case, not even one. Only criminals should be injured, oppressed, threatened, or intimidated by any law enforcement representative.
I have always told everyone to tell the FBI to place me under arrest for any alleged crimes, and told the FBI to assist anyone who wished to file a lawsuit against me.
My ultimate goals are to have my privacy restored to the same level as all other law abiding Americans, to be able to provide a comfortable life for family, and to be as successful as I can possibly be for the rest of my life. To enable others to utilize telepathy as I have, for the greater good of all. To do so with empathy, compassion, while recognizing the dignity and worth of all human beings, and according to state and federal law as well as the United States Constitution. I would be more of a philanthropist than anyone currently involved in this case, provided this case is legally addressed. Awareness of this provides additional motive for Mike Warren and individuals within the Justice Department/FBI to prevent a legal resolution.
Connecting The Dots
The laws are included so that one cannot be deceived by the FBI, an attorney, or anyone else in regards to the legalities of these events, as well as the civil rights we all have as Americans. Brief research helped me interpret some of these laws. Remember - our judicial system (courts) are the ruler of our laws, not the Justice Department/FBI. Repeat - our judicial system (courts) are the ruler of our laws, not the Justice Department/FBI. When this case began in 1983, these laws and other information were not accessible over the internet like today. Nor was I aware of any audio/video home monitoring systems available like today.
Herein is a public record of this case that began after my employment at Alagasco in 1983, again a subsidiary of Energen Corporation. William Mike Warren, jr. became the president (eventually the C.E.O.) of Energen Corporation about the same time I started working there in the Information Services Department as a Computer Programmer Trainee. I had recently received an Associate's Degree in Computer Science, and was concerned about how good my programming skills would be in a business environment. I was twenty-five years old at the time, learning the hard way, and thrilled to have landed a job with such a good employer. After a move to a new office location, my cubicle was on the ground floor facing the street in downtown
Birmingham, AL. The tinted window directly in front of my cubicle extended from the floor to the ceiling. Sitting at my desk I could see everyone walking by.Doug Johnson was the Director of information Services, a department consisting of approximately thirty employees. I initially met Doug after I graduated at an event attended by various employers. Submitting my resume to him led to my employment at Alagasco.
Not long after I began employment, Doug had me placed under hidden recorded surveillance in the privacy of my home. Doug's accomplice was George Parker, who also worked for Doug in the telecommunications area of Information Services, and was responsible for setting up technology throughout the state. George's immediate boss was Mickey Rains, second in command of Information Services. Mickey was aware of the activities of Doug and George in regards to their involvement in this case.
So it began.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/03/07/erin-andrews-awarded-55-million-in-peephole-case/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ed7244089d22
According to "2021 The Code of Alabama" (Alabama Law), crimes committed by these acts are:
Section 13A-6-24
Reckless endangerment.
(a) A person commits the crime of reckless endangerment if he recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person.
(b) Reckless endangerment is a Class A misdemeanor (max. one year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
Section 13A-7-2
Criminal trespass in the first degree.
(a) a person is guilty of criminal trespass in the first degree if he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling.
(b) Criminal trespass in the first degree is a Class A misdemeanor (max. one year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
Section 13A-7-26
Criminal tampering in the second degree.
(a) A person commits the crime of criminal tampering in the second degree if, having no right to do so or any reasonable ground to believe that he has such a right, he:
(1) Intentionally tampers with property of another for the purpose of causing substantial inconvenience to that person or to another; or
(2) Intentionally tampers or makes connection with property of a utility.
(b) Criminal tampering in the second degree is a Class B misdemeanor (max. six months imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $3000.00 fine).
Section 13A-11-30
Definitions.
The following definitions apply to this article:
(1) EAVESDROP. To overhear, record, amplify or transmit any part of the private communication of others without the consent of at least one of the persons engaged in the communication, except as otherwise provided by law.
(2) PRIVATE PLACE. A place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance, but such term does not include a place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access.
(3) SURVEILLANCE. Secret observation of the activities of another person for the purpose of spying upon and invading the privacy of the person observed.
Section 13A-11-31
Criminal eavesdropping.
(a) A person commits the crime of criminal eavesdropping if he intentionally uses any device to eavesdrop, whether or not he is present at the time.
(b) Criminal eavesdropping is a Class A misdemeanor (max. one year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
Section 13A-11-33
Installing eavesdropping device.
(a) A person commits the crime of installing an eavesdropping device if he intentionally installs or places a device in a private place with knowledge it is to be used for eavesdropping and without permission of the owner and any lessee or tenant or guest for hire of the private place.
(b) Installing an eavesdropping device in a private place is prima facie evidence of knowledge that the device is to be used for eavesdropping.
(c) Installing an eavesdropping device is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or min. 1 year 1 day, with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offence).
Initially it took about two years for me to conclude that surveillance was in my home. Even then I mistakenly believed it was only audio surveillance for a few more years. I state "initially" because I eventually moved six times during my nearly eleven year employment at Alagasco. I was in denial. The signs were there. I kept telling myself that Doug would not do such a thing.
During this time friction grew in the work environment between myself and John Allen. John became my supervisor after Preston Barron, the supervisor that hired me (with Doug Johnson's approval) retired after I had been working there about a year. I blew the whistle on John frequently throughout my employment due to the negative impact he was having upon my progress at work. John and I had some heated confrontations through the years of my employment at Alagasco.
 |
| ? |
as well. As far as "why" Doug initially placed the surveillance in my home, I concluded that it could only be due to the women I was having relationships with. At the time the surveillance was placed in my home, I was dating often. The first summer of my employment at Energen Corporation Doug had a departmental party at his place at the lake. My date was with someone who also worked at Alagasco, someone that Doug had previously indicated to me he was attracted to sexually. Doug asked me at the party if I was "getting any of that". I told him that was a personal question. Like a director in a movie, Doug often made remarks to me about how to have sex with a woman. I was partying every Friday and Saturday nights to the wee hours of the morning, and getting over the hangover on Sundays. Doug could have easily fired me if he did not approve of what he was observing me doing. Alabama is an employment-at-will state. I received raises instead.
After becoming aware of the surveillance I became extremely fearful for my career, my future, my life. I knew that "invasion of privacy" was against the law. I did not want Doug to know I was aware of the surveillance. I wondered what Doug and George would do to prevent me from holding them legally accountable.
I was very proud of my job at Alagasco. It was obvious that Doug was going to be a tremendous detriment to my continued employment there. Perhaps anywhere else as well. I decided to clean up my lifestyle. Perhaps Doug would then pull the surveillance out of my home and leave me in peace. I quit drinking, smoking, resumed exercising and lost forty-five pounds over several months. I maintained an exemplary lifestyle by "Christian" standards with the exception of continuing to have a female companion living with me without being married.
As soon as I began making these changes in my lifestyle, I discerned that Doug began telling others within our department about activities occurring in the privacy of my home, and encouraging them to give me the "cold shoulder" as well. Doug claimed the surveillance was not illegal.
According to "2021 The Code of Alabama", Alabama laws pertaining to these acts include the following:
Section 15-3-5
Offenses having no limitation.
(a) There is no limitation of time within which a prosecution must be commenced for:
(2) Any felony involving the use, attempted use, or threat of, violence to a person;
Section 6-2-3
Accrual of claim - Fraud
In actions seeking relief on the ground of fraud where the statute has created a bar, the claim must not be considered as having accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the fact constituting the fraud, after which he must have two years within which to prosecute his action.
Section 6-5-100
Fraud - Right of action generally.
Fraud by one, accompanied with damage to the party defrauded, in all cases gives a right of action.
Section 6-5-101
Fraud - Misrepresentations of material facts.
Misrepresentations of a material fact made willfully to deceive, or recklessly without knowledge, and acted on by the opposite party, or if made by mistake and innocently and acted on by the opposite party, constitute legal fraud.
Section 6-5-102
Suppression of material facts.
Suppression of a material fact which the party is under an obligation to communicate constitutes fraud. The obligation to communicate may arise from the confidential relations of the parties or from the particular circumstances of the case.
Section 6-5-103
Deceit - Right of action generally.
Willful misrepresentation of a material fact made to induce another to act, and upon which he does act to his injury, will give a right of action. Mere concealment of such a fact, unless done in such a manner as to deceive and mislead, will not support an action. In all cases of deceit, knowledge of a falsehood constitutes an essential element. A fraudulent of reckless representation of facts as true, which the party may not know to be false, if intended to deceive, is equivalent to a knowledge of the falsehood.
Section 6-5-104
Deceit - Fraudulent deceit.
(a) One who willfully deceives another with intent to induce him to alter his position to his injury or risk is liable for any damage which he thereby suffers.
(b) A deceit within the meaning of this section is either:
(1) The suggestion as a fact of that which is not true by one who does not believe it to be true;
(2) The assertion as a fact of that which is not true by one who has no reasonable ground for believing it to be true;
(3) The suppression of a fact by one who is bound to disclose it or who gives information of other facts which are likely to mislead for want of communication of that fact; or
(4) A promise made without any intention of performing it.
Section 6-5-182
Libel or slander - Burden of proof.
In an action for libel or slander, the plaintiff must prove, unless it shall be admitted by the defendant, the facts showing that the alleged defamatory matter was published or spoken of the plaintiff.
Section 13A-6-25
Criminal coercion.
(a) A person commits the crime of criminal coercion if, without legal authority, he threatens to confine, restrain or to cause physical injury to the threatened person or another, or to damage the property or reputation of the threatened person or another with intent thereby to induce the threatened person or another against his will to do an unlawful act or refrain from doing a lawful act.
(a) Criminal coercion is a Class A misdemeanor (max. one year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
Section 13A-8-1
Definitions generally.
(13) THREAT. A menace, however communicated, to:
a. Cause physical harm to the person threatened or to any other person; or
b. Cause damage to property; or
c. Subject the person threatened or any other person to physical confinement or restraint; or
d. Engage in any other conduct constituting a crime; or
e. Accuse any person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against any person; or
f. Expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt, or ridicule; or
g. Reveal any information sought to be concealed by the person threatened; or
h. Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another's legal claim or defense; or
i. Take action as an official against anyone or anything, or withhold official action, or cause such action or withholding; or
j. Bring about or continue a strike, boycott, or other similar collective action to obtain property which is not demanded or received for the benefit of the group which the actor purports to represent; or
k. Do any other act which would not in itself substantially benefit the actor but which is calculated to harm substantially another person with respect to his or her health, safety, business, calling, career, financial condition, reputation, or personal relationships.
Section 13A-8-13
Extortion - Definition.
A person commits the crime of extortion if he knowingly obtains by treat control over the property of another, with intent to deprive him of the property.
Section 13A-8-14
Extortion in the first degree.
(a) Extortion by means of a threat as defined in paragraphs (13)a or (13)c of Section 13A-8-1, constitutes extortion in the first degree.
(b) Extortion in the first degree is a Class B felony (max. 20 years imprisonment or min. 2 years, with hard labor, fine not more than $30000.00).
Section 13A-8-15
Extortion in the second degree.
(a) Extortion by means of a threat, as defined in paragraph (13)b or (13)d through (13)k of Section 13A-8-1, constitutes extortion in the second degree.
(b) A person is not liable under this section for a threat, as defined in paragraph (13)e of Section 13A-8-1, if he honestly claims the property as restitution of indemnification for harm done in the circumstances to which the threat relates, or as compensation for property or lawful services. The burden of injecting the issue of claim of right is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
(c) Extortion in the second degree is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or min. 1 year 1 day, with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offence).
Section 13A-11-35
Divulging illegally-obtained information.
(a) A person commits the crime of divulging illegally-obtained information if he knowingly or recklessly uses or divulges information obtained through criminal eavesdropping or criminal surveillance.
(b) Divulging illegally-obtained information is a Class B misdemeanor (max. six months imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $3000.00 fine).
Doug claimed the reason for the surveillance in my home was for the safety and security of my coworkers. As a result it was necessary for Doug to make me look as bad as possible to everyone made aware of the surveillance in order to justify it. Nobody expressed any concerns to me regarding my personal life, to anyone responsible for safety and security at Alagasco, to any of the women I dated (including five women I dated whom were also employed by Energen Corporation), nor to any law enforcement officer or agency. 
I expected someone to inform me of the surveillance regardless of what Doug said about me. Instead they did a good job of giving me the cold shoulder in the work environment as Doug instructed. Eventually I suffered tremendously thru anxiety attacks resulting from the conflict between fight or flight responses. I had to be professional, at the same time it infuriated me that some of my coworkers were helping Doug invade my privacy. A prescription of Inderall from the doctor helped me control my emotions. (Inderall belongs to a class of blood pressure meds called beta blockers. Besides lowering BP, they also block the adrenalin rush that one gets during anxiety attacks.)
Doug told those he made aware of the surveillance to keep it a secret because he did not want other people at Energen Corporation to know about it, primarily C.E.O. William Mike Warren, jr.. Therefore I knew if I said anything to anyone about the surveillance, the surveillance would most likely be denied.
I was determined to figure out a way to get Mike Warren aware of the surveillance. During a presentation a man described Mike Warren as a man that would do the right thing regardless of the consequences. From what I had heard and experienced, I was convinced Mike Warren would bring an end to the surveillance, and penalize those responsible for the surveillance once he found out about it. During this time period Mike Warren was promoting Energen Corporation as one of the top one-hundred best places to work in the United States, and subsequently Energen Corporation was recognized as such in a book.
Regarding those receiving illegally obtained information, "2021 Code of Alabama":
Section 13A-2-1
Definitions - Generally.
The following definitions apply to this Criminal Code:
(1) ACT. A bodily movement, and such term includes possession of property.
(2) VOLUNTARY ACT. An act performed consciously as a result of effort or determination, and such term includes the possession of property if the actor was aware of his physical possession or control thereof for a sufficient time to have been able to terminate it.
(3) OMISSION. A failure to perform an act as to which a duty of performance is imposed by law.
(4) CONDUCT. An act or omission and its accompanying mental state.
(5) TO ACT. Either to perform an act or to omit to perform an act.
(6) CULPABLE MENTAL STATE. Such term means "intentionally" or "knowingly" or "recklessly" or with "criminal negligence", as these terms are defined in Section 13A-2-2.
Section 13A-2-2
Definitions - Definitions of culpable mental state.
The following definitions apply to this Criminal Code:
(1) INTENTIONALLY. A person acts intentionally with respect to a result or to conduct described by a statute defining an offense, when his purpose is to cause that result or to engage in that conduct.
(2) KNOWINGLY. A person acts knowingly with respect to conduct or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense when he is aware that his conduct is of that nature or that the circumstance exists.
(3) RECKLESSLY. A person acts recklessly with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense when he is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation. A person who creates a risk but is unaware thereof solely by reason of voluntary intoxication, as defined in subdivision (e)(2) of Section 13A-3-2, acts recklessly with respect thereto.
(4) CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE. A person acts with criminal negligence with respect to a result or to a circumstance which is defined by statute as an offense when he fails to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation. A court or jury may consider statutes or ordinances regulating the defendant's conduct as bearing upon the question of criminal negligence.
Section 13A-2-3
Requirements for criminal liability in general and for offenses of strict liability and of mental culpability.
The minimum requirement for criminal liability is the performance by a person of conduct which includes a voluntary act or the omission to perform an act which he is physically capable of performing. If that conduct is all that is required for commission of a particular offense, or if an offense or some material element thereof does not require a culpable mental state on the part of the actor, the offense is one of "strict liability." If a culpable mental state on the part of the actor is required with respect to any material element of an offense, the offense is one of "mental culpability."
Section 13A-2-4
Construction of statutes with respect to culpability requirements.
(a) When a statute defining an offense prescribes as an element thereof a specified culpable mental state, such mental state is presumed to apply to every element of the offense unless the context thereof indicates to the contrary.
(b) Although no culpable mental state is expressly designated in a statute defining an offense, an appropriate culpable mental state may nevertheless be required for the commission of that offense, or with respect to some or all of the material elements thereof, if the proscribed conduct necessarily involves such culpable mental state. A statute defining a crime, unless clearly indicating a legislative intent to impose strict liability, states a crime of mental culpability.
(c) If a statute provides that criminal negligence suffices to establish an element of an offense, that element also is established if a person acts recklessly, knowingly or intentionally. If recklessness suffices to establish an element, that element also is established if a person acts knowingly and intentionally. If acting knowingly suffices to establish an element, that element also is established if a person acts intentionally.
Section 13A-2-5
Causal relationship between conduct and results; relationship to mental culpability.
(a) A person is criminally liable if the result would not have occurred but for his conduct, operating either alone or concurrently with another cause, unless the concurrent cause was sufficient to produce the result and the conduct of the actor clearly insufficient.
(b) A person is nevertheless criminally liable for causing a result if the only difference between what actually occurred and what he intended, contemplated or risked is that:
(1) A different person or property was injured, harmed or affected; or
(2) A less serious or less extensive injury or harm occurred.
(c) When causing a particular result is a material element of an offense for which absolute liability is imposed by law, the element is not established unless the actual result is a probable consequence of the actor's conduct.
Section 13A-2-6
Effect of ignorance or mistake upon liability.
(a) A person is not relieved of criminal liability for conduct because he engages in that conduct under a mistaken belief of fact unless:
(1) His factual mistake negatives the culpable mental state required for the commission of an offense; or
(2) The statute defining the offense or a statute related thereto expressly provides that such a factual mistake constitutes a defense or exemption; or
(3) The factual mistake is of a kind that supports a defense of justification as defined in Article 2 of Chapter 3 of this title.
(b) A person is not relieved of criminal liability for conduct because he engages in that conduct under a mistaken belief that it does not, as a matter of law, constitute an offense, unless his mistaken belief is founded upon an official statement of the law contained in a statute or the latest judicial decision of the highest state or federal court which has decided on the matter.
(c) The burden of injecting the issue of mistake of law under subsection (b) of this section is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
(d) A mistake of law, other than as to the existence or meaning of the statute under which the defendant is prosecuted, is relevant to disprove the specific state of mental culpability required by the statute under which the defendant is prosecuted.
Section 13A-2-7
Consent.
(a) In general. - The consent of the victim to conduct charged to constitute an offense or to the result thereof is a defense if such consent negatives a required element of the offense or precludes the infliction of the harm or evil sought to be prevented by the law defining the offense.
(b) Consent to bodily harm. - When conduct is charged to constitute an offense because it causes or threatens bodily harm, consent to such conduct or to the infliction of such harm is a defense only if:
(1) The bodily harm consented to or threatened by the conduct consented to is not serious; or
(2) The conduct and the harm are reasonably foreseeable hazards of joint participation in a lawful athletic contest or competitive sport; or
(3) The consent establishes a justification for the conduct under Article 2 of Chapter 3 of this title.
(c) Ineffective consent. - Unless otherwise provided by this Criminal Code or by the law defining the offense, assent does not constitute consent if:
(1) It is given by a person who is legally incompetent to authorize the conduct; or
(2) It is given by a person who by reason of immaturity, mental disease or defect, or intoxication is manifestly unable and known by the actor to be unable to make a reasonable judgment as to the nature or harmfulness of the conduct; or
(3) It is given by a person whose consent is sought to be prevented by the law defining the offense; or
(4) It is induced by force, duress or deception.
Section 13A-2-20
Criminal liability based upon behavior.
A person is criminally liable for an offense if it is committed by his own behavior or by the behavior of another person for which he is legally accountable as provided for in this article, or both.
Section 13A-2-21
Criminal liability based upon behavior of another - Accountability imposed by statute.
A person is legally accountable for the behavior of another person if he is made accountable for the behavior of such person by the statute defining the offense or by specific provision of this title.
Section 13A-2-22
Criminal liability based upon behavior of another - Conduct of an innocent person.
(a) A person is legally accountable for the behavior of another if, acting with the culpable mental state sufficient for the commission of the offense in question, he causes an innocent person to engage in such behavior.
(b) As used in this section, an "innocent person" includes any person who is not guilty of the offense in question, despite his behavior, because of:
(1) Criminal irresponsibility or other legal incapacity or exemption.
(2) Unawareness of the criminal nature of the conduct in question or of the defendant's criminal purpose.
(3) Any other factor precluding the mental state sufficient for the commission of the offense in question.
Section 13A-2-23
Criminal liability based upon behavior of another - Complicity.
A person is legally accountable for the behavior of another constituting a criminal offense if, with the intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense:
(1) He procures, induces or causes such other person to commit the offense; or
(2) He aids or abets such other person in committing the offense; or
(3) Having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, he fails to make an effort he is legally required to make.
Section 13A-2-24
Criminal liability based upon behavior of another - Exceptions.
Unless otherwise provided by the statute defining the offense, a person shall not be legally accountable for behavior of another constituting a criminal offense if:
(1) He is a victim of that offense; or
(2) The offense is so defined that his conduct is inevitably incidental to its commission; or
(3) Prior to the commission of the offense, he voluntarily terminated his effort to promote or assist its commission and either gave timely and adequate warning to law enforcement authorities, or
to the intended victim, or wholly deprived his complicity of its effectiveness in the commission of the offense. The burden of injecting this issue is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
to the intended victim, or wholly deprived his complicity of its effectiveness in the commission of the offense. The burden of injecting this issue is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
Section 13A-2-25
Criminal liability based upon behavior of another - Certain defenses not available.
In a prosecution for an offense in which criminal liability is based upon the behavior of another person pursuant to this article, it is no defense that:
(1) Such other person has not been prosecuted for or convicted of any offense based upon the behavior in question, or has been previously acquitted thereof, or has been convicted of a different offense or degree of offense.
(2) The defendant belongs to a class of persons who, by definition of the offense, are legally incapable of committing the offense in an individual capacity.
Section 13A-2-26
Criminal liability of an individual for corporate conduct.
A person is criminally liable for conduct constituting an offense which he performs or causes to be performed in the name of or in behalf of a corporation to the same extent as if such conduct were performed in his own name or behalf.
Section 13A-4-1
Criminal solicitation.
(a) A person is guilty of criminal solicitation if, with the intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a crime, he solicits, requests, commands or importunes such other person to engage in such conduct.
A person may not be convicted of criminal solicitation upon the uncorroborated testimony of the person allegedly solicited, and there must be proof of circumstances corroborating both the solicitation and the defendant's intent.
(b) A person is not liable under this section if, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal intent, he (1) notified the person solicited of his renunciation and
(2) gave timely and adequate warning to the law enforcement authorities or otherwise made a substantial effort to prevent the commission of the criminal conduct solicited. The burden of injecting this issue is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
(2) gave timely and adequate warning to the law enforcement authorities or otherwise made a substantial effort to prevent the commission of the criminal conduct solicited. The burden of injecting this issue is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
(c) A person is not liable under this section when his solicitation constitutes conduct of a kind that is necessarily incidental to the commission of the offense solicited. When the solicitation constitutes an offense other than criminal solicitation which is related to but separate from the offense solicited, defendant is guilty of such related offense only and not of criminal solicitation.
(d) It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal solicitation that the person solicited could not be guilty of the offense solicited because of:
(1) Criminal irresponsibility or other legal incapacity or exemption; or
(2) Unawareness of the criminal nature of the conduct solicited or of the defendant's criminal purpose; or
(3) Any other factor precluding the mental state required for the commission of the offense in question.
(e) It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal solicitation that defendant belongs to a class of persons who by definition are legally incapable in an individual capacity of committing the offense that he solicited another to commit.
(f) Criminal solicitation is a:
(1) Class A felony if the offense solicited is murder (life or not more than 99 years or less than 10 years imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $60,000.00 fine).
(2) Class B felony if the offense solicited is a Class A felony (max. 20 years, min. 2 years imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $30,000.00 fine).
(3) Class C felony if the offense solicited is a Class B felony (max. 10 years, min. 1 year and 1 day imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $15,000.00 fine).
(4) Class A misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class C felony (not more than 1 year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
(5) Class B misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class A misdemeanor (not more than six months year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $3000.00 fine).
(6) Class C misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class B misdemeanor (not more than three months imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $500.00 fine).
(7) Violation if the offense solicited is a Class C misdemeanor (definite term of imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, definite amount, fixed by the court, not to exceed $200.00, or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offense).
Section 13A-4-2
Attempt.
(a) A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if, with the intent to commit a specific offense, he does any overt act towards the commission of such offense.
(b) It is no defense under this section that the offense charged to have been attempted was, under the attendant circumstances, factually or legally impossible of commission, if such offense could have been committed had the attendant circumstances been as the defendant believed them to be.
(c) A person is not liable under this section if, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of this criminal intent, he avoided the commission of the offense attempted by abandoning his criminal effort and, if mere abandonment is insufficient to accomplish such avoidance, by taking further and affirmative steps which prevented the commission thereof. The burden of injecting this issue is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
(d) An attempt is a:
(1) Class A felony if the offense solicited is murder (life or not more than 99 years or less than 10 years imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $60,000.00 fine).
(2) Class B felony if the offense solicited is a Class A felony (max. 20 years, min. 2 years imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $30,000.00 fine).
(3) Class C felony if the offense solicited is a Class B felony (max. 10 years, min. 1 year and 1 day imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $15,000.00 fine).
(4) Class A misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class C felony (not more than 1 year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
(5) Class B misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class A misdemeanor (not more than six months year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $3000.00 fine).
(6) Class C misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class B misdemeanor (not more than three months imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $500.00 fine).
(7) Violation if the offense solicited is a Class C misdemeanor (definite term of imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, definite amount, fixed by the court, not to exceed $200.00, or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offense).
Section 13A-4-3
Criminal conspiracy generally.
(a) A person is guilty of criminal conspiracy if, with the intent that conduct constituting an offense be performed, he agrees with one or more persons to engage in or cause the performance of such conduct, and any one or more of such persons does an overt act to effect an objective of the agreement.
(b) If a person knows or should know that one with whom he agrees has in turn agreed or will agree with another to effect the same criminal objective, he shall be deemed to have agreed with such other person, whether or not he knows the other's identity.
(c) A person is not liable under this section if, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal purpose, he gave a timely and adequate warning to law enforcement authorities or made a substantial effort to prevent the enforcement of the criminal conduct contemplated by the conspiracy. Renunciation by one conspirator, however, does not affect the liability of another conspirator who does not join in the abandonment of the conspiratorial objective. The burden of injecting the issue of renunciation is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof.
(d) It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal conspiracy that:
(1) The person, or persons, with whom defendant is alleged to have conspired has been acquitted, has not been prosecuted or convicted, has been convicted of a different offense or is immune from prosecution, or
(2) The person, or persons, with whom defendant conspired could not be guilty of the conspiracy or the object crime because of lack of mental responsibility or culpability, or other legal incapacity or defense, or
(3) The defendant belongs to a class of persons who by definition are legally incapable in an individual capacity of committing the offense that is the object of the conspiracy.
(e) A conspirator is not liable under this section if, had the criminal conduct contemplated by the conspiracy actually been performed, he would be immune from liability under the law defining the offense or as an accomplice under Section 13A-2-24.
(f) Liability as accomplice. - Accomplice liability for offenses committed in furtherance of a conspiracy is to be determined as provided in Section 13A-2-23.
(g) Criminal conspiracy is a:
(1) Class A felony if the offense solicited is murder (life or not more than 99 years or less than 10 years imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $60,000.00 fine).
(2) Class B felony if the offense solicited is a Class A felony (max. 20 years, min. 2 years imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $30,000.00 fine).
(3) Class C felony if the offense solicited is a Class B felony (max. 10 years, min. 1 year and 1 day imprisonment including hard labor, not more than $15,000.00 fine).
(4) Class A misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class C felony (not more than 1 year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
(5) Class B misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class A misdemeanor (not more than six months year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $3000.00 fine).
(6) Class C misdemeanor if the offense solicited is a Class B misdemeanor (not more than three months imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $500.00 fine).
(7) Violation if the offense solicited is a Class C misdemeanor (definite term of imprisonment not to exceed 30 days, definite amount, fixed by the court, not to exceed $200.00, or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offense).
Section 13A-4-5
Consummation of object offense not defense to prosecution; multiple convictions on basis of same course of conduct.
(a) It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal solicitation, Section 13A-4-1, attempt, Section 13A-4-2, or criminal conspiracy, Section 13A-4-3, that the offense solicited, attempted or conspired was actually committed.
(b) A person may not be convicted on the basis of the same course of conduct of both the actual commission of an offense and:
(1) An attempt to commit the offense; or
(2) Criminal solicitation of the offense; or
(3) Criminal conspiracy of the offense.
(c) A person may not be convicted of more than one of the offenses defined in Sections 13A-4-1, 13A-4-2 and 13A-4-3 for a single course of conduct designed to commit or to cause the commission of the same crime.
(1) Harbors or conceals such person;
(2) Warns such person of impending discovery or apprehension; except that this subdivision does not apply to a warning given in connection with an effort to bring another into compliance with the law;
(3) Provides such person with money, transportation, weapon, disguise or other means of avoiding discovery or apprehension;
(4) Prevents or obstructs, by means of force, deception or intimidation, anyone except a trespasser from performing an act that might aid in the discovery or apprehension of such person; or
(5) Suppresses, by an act of concealment, alteration or destruction, any physical evidence that might aid in the discovery or apprehension of such person.
(a) A person commits the crime of hindering prosecution in the first degree if with the intent to hinder the apprehension, prosecution, conviction or punishment of another for conduct constituting a murder or a Class A or B felony, he renders criminal assistance to such person.
(b) Hindering prosecution in the first degree is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or min. 1 year 1 day, with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offense).
(a) A person commits the crime of hindering prosecution in the second degree if with the intent to hinder the apprehension, prosecution, conviction or punishment of another for conduct constituting a Class C felony or a Class A misdemeanor, he renders criminal assistance to such person.
(b) Hindering prosecution in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor (max. one year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
Section 13A-10-42
Hindering prosecution or apprehension - Definition of "criminal assistance".
For the purposes of Sections 13A-10-43 through 13A-10-45, a person renders "criminal assistance" to another if he:(1) Harbors or conceals such person;
(2) Warns such person of impending discovery or apprehension; except that this subdivision does not apply to a warning given in connection with an effort to bring another into compliance with the law;
(3) Provides such person with money, transportation, weapon, disguise or other means of avoiding discovery or apprehension;
(4) Prevents or obstructs, by means of force, deception or intimidation, anyone except a trespasser from performing an act that might aid in the discovery or apprehension of such person; or
(5) Suppresses, by an act of concealment, alteration or destruction, any physical evidence that might aid in the discovery or apprehension of such person.
Section 13A-10-43
Hindering prosecution in the first degree.
(a) A person commits the crime of hindering prosecution in the first degree if with the intent to hinder the apprehension, prosecution, conviction or punishment of another for conduct constituting a murder or a Class A or B felony, he renders criminal assistance to such person.
(b) Hindering prosecution in the first degree is a Class C felony (max. 10 years imprisonment or min. 1 year 1 day, with hard labor, fine not more than $15000.00; or any amount not exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offense).
Section 13A-10-44
Hindering prosecution in the second degree.
(a) A person commits the crime of hindering prosecution in the second degree if with the intent to hinder the apprehension, prosecution, conviction or punishment of another for conduct constituting a Class C felony or a Class A misdemeanor, he renders criminal assistance to such person.
(b) Hindering prosecution in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor (max. one year imprisonment or hard labor, not more than $6000.00 fine).
PRIVATE PROPERTY
I bought my first house in 1990 hoping that would end the surveillance. I had lived in four different apartment complexes until then. Before moving into the house, I told my girlfriend that we should live apart due to what I was going through at work. At the time I was convinced that video surveillance was occurring. Our relationship ended a few months afterwards after nearly five years. I had become an unpleasant person to be around, obsessed with the surveillance and the treatment I received from those aiding Doug. She decided it was time to move on.
In this case I agreed with the saying, "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer". Throughout I considered finding another job but did not believe I would be able to determine if the surveillance was continuing unless I was around the people responsible for conducting it. Many times they acted as though the surveillance was no longer occurring to see what I would do. As time passed it had become easy to determine if I was under surveillance by an action in the privacy of my home and waiting for a reaction in the work environment. And Doug and many of my coworkers reacted conspicuously enough times to dismiss it as coincidence, but ambiguously enough for me not to be able to use it as evidence of the surveillance. What I experienced in the Information Services Department at Alagasco could easily be considered an attempt by Doug to commit "depraved heart murder". I kept telling myself that one day I would be rewarded generously for all my pain and suffering.
It was rejuvenating to my mental psyche to be around people uninfluenced by Doug. I have always related well with people, focused on their positive characteristics, regardless of who they are. I am a "people person". Observing the improvement in my morale away from the work environment, Doug instructed George to stalk me and talk to the people that worked at places I frequented. Doug could not stand for anyone to be nice to me that he could influence to do otherwise. Like the people at work, they told them the surveillance in my home was not illegal. They claimed the surveillance was for their safety and security, and made allegations regarding my personal life to subject me to public contempt and ridicule. Bottom line, it was a matter of committing "fraud" to convince anyone being told about the surveillance that I am the bad guy even though they are the ones that will lose a lawsuit and be placed under arrest for the crimes they are committing. People believed them, and I noticed an easily distinguishable change of behavior from the people working at places I frequented. I considered that whatever they said about my actions in the privacy of my home as confessing to serious crimes and continued to expect a knowledgeable law abiding citizen to inform me that my privacy was being invaded. To reiterate, if what they were saying about me was true or not they are committing extortion in the second degree ("§13A-8-1(15)a Extortion by means of a threat as defined by paragraphs (14)b or 14(d) through (14)k of section 13A-8-1, constitutes extortion in the second degree - §13A-8-1(14)f. Expose a secret or publicize and asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject a person to hatred or contempt, or ridicule - 2021 The Code of Alabama"), a Class C felony, and providing evidence of multiple crimes being committed. Doug, George, and Micky did not accuse me of doing anything illegal, otherwise they could have called law enforcement to catch me in the act of violating the law. Being charged with a crime is a good reason to terminate one's employment even though (again) you do not need a reason in the state of Alabama.
Under Doug's instructions, George was going in and out of my house while I was at work like he owned it. I bought an ADT security system for the house. George knew the code for it. I changed the code while covering up the keypad and set up a sound activated tape recorder in a key locked box.
Doug previously pointed out to me that he had connections in the
Birmingham Police Department so I did not call them. I talked to
Rusty Cook about the illegal surveillance, a corporate attorney for
Energen Corporation. Rusty told me to document everything that was
going on. I told him that I wanted to keep the legalities of the matter
between me and the people committing the crimes.
He acknowledged that he understood. I also had addressed the matter
with Bill Bibb who was in charge of the Personnel Department. Bill was
in complete disbelief about the matter. He told me there is no way
something like that could be happening, I could sue Energen Corporation
if it were. Considering Doug was fearful of C.E.O. Mike Warren finding out about the illegal surveillance, I decided to write a letter to Mike Warren to inform him of the illegal surveillance. I believed my coworkers in Information Services would be happy to tell the C.E.O. about the surveillance they had been told by Doug was legal, and for their safety and security even though Doug instructed them not to. My coworkers would expect the C.E.O. to take action to ensure their safety and security also. 
After receiving the letter Mike Warren assigned the matter to the eventual President of Energen Corporation, Gary C. Youngblood. In a meeting with Gary he informed me that he would conduct an investigation and get back with me afterwards.
The following letters reflect some of what eventually occurred after Gary Youngblood's investigation. During this time I recorded George entering my home, keying in the ADT security code, opening the key locked box the recorder was in and turning it off. George attempted to erase the contents on the tape with a magnet. It moved the recording on the tape, but did not erase it.
Mark Wilcoxin worked in the Personnel Department at Energen Corporation.
What qualifications does a psychiatrist have to determine if someone is committing a crime? None, and I repeatedly reminded Dr. Grant of that. Would the Alagasco perpetrators of these crimes confess and face the consequences of their actions if they believe they could lie and get away with it? These crimes result in lawsuits and prison time. So do the allegations I made if they are false.
I offered to play the tape of George entering my home to Gary Youngblood and Dr. Grant. They refused to listen to it. I tried to show them the document a private investigator had signed regarding what he believed the sounds were on the tape. They refused to read it.
In the June 18th, 1992 letter Alagasco acknowledges the serious nature of the crimes I am reporting to them. In the same letter Alagasco states they do not care if there is evidence to support my allegations, they do not want to hear about it! Furthermore, they threaten to terminate my employment if I provide evidence to them that Doug Johnson, George Parker, Mickey Rains and/or everyone helping them are committing these serious crimes.
The medication they were trying to force me to take has horrendous possible side effects. I sat in Dr. Grant's office as he demonstrated the facial contortions, muscle spasms that I could experience. I never took any of the medication. I believed I would have been unable to exercise which, as they were well aware, had become extremely important to me in managing stress. Since I had quit smoking and drinking, Doug had continuously tried to get me to start again, as well as provoke me to take action in an outrage that he could use against me. As I unexpectedly walked by one day, I saw Doug show Mickey a hand gun he had in his desk drawer in case I did. I believed Doug to be capable of murder and, if I resigned and enough time passed to disassociate me from employment at Alagasco, he would try to get away with it to avoid facing the legal consequences of his actions. A great deal of time, effort, and money was being spent on deceiving people into believing I was a person the world would be better off without.
The reason I reported these actions to the leadership of Energen Corporation was to give them an opportunity to resolve the matter without becoming illegally involved in it. Energen Corporation portrayed itself to the public as highly ethical and law abiding. It was as easy task to confirm George Parker was illegally entering my home(s) under the orders of Doug Johnson. All that was required was to place surveillance in the Alagasco office of Doug Johnson, or have someone investigate George Parker's actions long enough during work hours to catch him in the act. There were no actions of this nature taken by Gary Youngblood prior to sending me to a psychiatrist (on condition of employment). A simple 'no, i did not find any evidence to support your allegations' or "your employment is terminated" from Gary Youngblood after his investigation into the matter would have sufficed. The actions he took were to convince me to cease looking for evidence of the surveillance and stalking, and to convince me that I was crazy for thinking that it was.
I was looking to retire at an early age after winning a lawsuit if this is what having to earn a paycheck was all about.I moved again. This time over forty miles away, an hour and a half drive round trip. Family lived around the corner. I hoped that would make them less inclined to enter my home during work hours, and easier to catch them if they did.
Again it was a matter of taking action in my automobile and privacy of my home to get them talking, and checking for a reaction in the work environment to determine if stalking and surveillance was continuing. Doug loved to hold me in contempt, and loved for others to do the same. Aware that I had spoken to a private investigator, the surveillance had become a matter of necessity. They had to convince a private investigator, or anyone I asked to obtain evidence of the surveillance not to do so. Now living further away, George was spending more time keeping an eye on me during company time and off. A new person was hired to help George by the name of John Smith. Like before, fraud and extortion again was committed by Doug, George, and John to convince the people in my new community to hold me in contempt.
I bought surveillance detection equipment hoping to find the surveillance equipment. I believed the technology they were using was not detectable by my equipment. I considered even if I did find it, they would deny they had anything to do with it. I did not invest in more expensive equipment considering the lack of job security.
I had grown proficient in my job responsibilities and believed I could support all the major tasks of the "Customer Accounting System". Due to turnover in my area, I received some excellent assignments that developed my programming skills and knowledge. Doug managed to convince the leadership of Alagasco to invest in a new Customer Accounting System initially budgeted to cost around fifteen million, which soon increased to over twenty million dollars. Venders were coming and going, eager to please Doug. I was continuing to battle anxiety attacks, had grown extremely reticent, particularly with anyone that Doug influenced.
During the initial phases of the conversion process of the new system to Alagasco specifications, Doug was removed from his job as "Director of Information Services", but remained employed by Alagasco in a menial task capacity. Roger Dubble had become the "Vice-President of Information Services", and Mickey Rains replaced Doug as "Director of Information Services".
During the initial phases of the conversion process of the new system to Alagasco specifications, Doug was removed from his job as "Director of Information Services", but remained employed by Alagasco in a menial task capacity. Roger Dubble had become the "Vice-President of Information Services", and Mickey Rains replaced Doug as "Director of Information Services".
The Light At The End Of A Long Dark Tunnel.....
While in charge, Doug utilized his position to eventually cause almost the entire Information Services Department to be in a "culpable mental state" ("§13A-2-2 Definitions of Culpable Mental State - 2021 The Code of Alabama") regarding the crime wave he began over nine years prior to being removed from his position. In doing so, anyone criminally liable was provided motive "to act" ("§13A-2-1(5) Definitions - Generally - 2021 The Code of Alabama") to avoid legal accountability. Perhaps if I was a woman, or they were aware of the true motive for Doug's actions, everyone would have acted differently.
After Mickey was placed in charge of the Information Services Department, he told Mr. Dubble about the illegal surveillance, and my efforts to legally address those responsible for it. Mickey confessed to multiple crimes to Mr. Dubble, and acted offended by my alleged lawful actions in the privacy of my home. Again, the law in Alabama is hire at will, fire at will.
While I exhibited awareness of ongoing events such as the stalking being conducted, and at times succeeding in avoiding the surveillance (which caused concern of impending legal action), C.E.O. Mike Warren was notified of the years of surveillance in my home(s). This occurred over a year after I was forced to go to a psychiatrist on condition of employment for reporting the same information to him.
Doug gave his best effort to convince Mike Warren the surveillance was for legitimate reasons. Mike Warren, a former practicing attorney, responded by telling Doug he did not want to hear about or see the content of the media that had been recorded in the privacy of my home(s). Mike Warren threatened to fire Doug, as well as every other person working for Doug that was aware of the illegal surveillance. In response Doug talked about his wife, children, grandbabies, years of service to the church and company.
It took over eight years to accomplish two objectives: 1) provide evidence to the leadership of Energen Corporation that the illegal surveillance was occurring. 2) who was responsible for conducting it.
During the following days I eagerly expected Mike Warren to arrange for someone to tell me I was right about the surveillance....you can resolve this matter legally with the perpetrators of these crimes....we apologize for the mistake we made in forcing you to go to a psychiatrist on condition of employment; or take some actions to express remorse for treating me like I was crazy since Mike Warren had discovered the surveillance was occurring. Anything Mike Warren did to conceal the evidence would intentionally be illegal (as defined by previously stated laws).
To address the problem, Mike Warren hired an attorney, employed by Energen Corporation, to evaluate the people involved in the illegal surveillance. There were many allegations being made against me. I considered Mike Warren needed to sort out fact from fiction from someone impartial to the matter. The attorney's name is Kelly Leigh Dickenson. Instead of talking to me about the allegations made against me, and giving me the ability to respond to them without being treated like I was crazy, Kelly began surveillance on me at my desk.
It did not take long for Kelly to recognize that I was under a tremendous amount of mental and emotional duress. She took pity on me. When she let Doug, George, and Mickey (the people responsible for the surveillance in my home) know that if they did not remove the surveillance she was going to make me rich, I thought - my prayers have been answered. Kelly vehemently defended me against all the contempt and ridicule from Doug, George, Mickey, or anyone aware of the surveillance who commented about my alleged personal life. I was grateful for Kelly and Mike Warren helping me in this regard. I felt a little safer, but I looked forward to a legal resolution to the case. Until such, there would be no resolution, and those illegally involved would continue to take additional illegal actions to prevent a legal resolution. I hoped this to be the reason for Kelly and Mike Warren to have me under surveillance...to protect me until a legal resolution was obtained. Considering the number of employees illegally involved in the case working in the Information Services Department, it would take some time for Mike Warren to ensure that normal business duties and responsibilities were not adversely affected by changes in personnel.
After several weeks I concluded that Kelly was also conducting surveillance on me in the privacy of my home, including observing a relationship with someone I briefly dated. Note - I did not have sexual relations with everyone I dated, and discontinued sexual relations after becoming aware of video surveillance. Dating someone always attracted viewer interest of my personal activities in my home, and briefly generated various comments from those made aware in the work environment. Again I considered that Mike Warren and Kelly had determined it was necessary for my safety, or possibly to appease those who fraudulently claimed I required surveillance for their safety.
When the illegal perpetrators told Kelly she was now as guilty as they were, Kelly responded that it was different for her because she was going to - marry me. Nobody took Kelly seriously at first, including myself. I thought she was saying that to support me, impress Mike Warren, or an effort to eventually obtain my consent to legalize watching me in the privacy of my home. When Kelly became jealous of another woman I spoke to at Energen Corporation, and checked with another woman I briefly dated that worked for Energen Corporation to see if she was still interested in me, it became obvious that Kelly had sincere feelings for me. An attorney - under the C.E.O.'s guidance (who also was an attorney) - telling those who had been illegally tormenting me for over eight years that she was going to marry me was a tremendous boost to my morale. I believed that actions were being taken to restore my privacy and a legal resolution would soon be obtained.
The TV Show "Lie To Me"
One can tell a great deal about someone by simply watching their mannerisms i.e. body language, facial expressions, the way one speaks, the cloths one wears, what kind of music one listens to, who one is talking to and how one is addressing them, changes in behavior. Particularly if you are able to observe them for several years, and in the privacy of their home. Of course if one is aware he/she is under surveillance, or being watched, one's behavior may change.
George Parker, Mickey Rains, Doug Johnson, Roger Dubble, among others recognized the improvement in my morale as a result of the support I was receiving from Kelly and Mike Warren. Again they could not determine how I was aware of the recent developments. From their observations, no one was telling me anything. Considering Kelly had taken over some of the responsibility for keeping me under surveillance, and she had no idea whom George had spoken to outside the work environment about my alleged personal life, they grew more concerned about someone providing me with the evidence I needed. With Kelly continuing to express her desire to marry me to others, I continued to expect C.E.O. Mike Warren "to act" ("§13A-2-1(5) Definitions - Generally - 2021 The Code of Alabama") in a lawful manner. Not only for himself, but on behalf of Energen Corporation. After Kelly's analysis of the case, it is now clear to Mike Warren that I am no threat to anyone, therefore there is no need for audio/video surveillance on me, nor has there ever been any legitimate need for Doug to place audio/video surveillance in my home(s). The woman wanted to marry me. Mike Warren is not a person that can be fraudulently convinced that the surveillance in my home(s) is legitimate like many were. Alabama state law is clear as defined per "§13A-11-2 Offences Against Privacy - 2021 The Code of Alabama".
U. S. federal law is clear as defined per the "United States Code", "Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure; and Appendix", "Chapter 88 - Privacy", which states the following:
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 1801 01/07/2011
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 88 - PRIVACY
-HEAD-
Sec. 1801. Video voyeurism
-STATUTE-
(a) Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction
of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a
private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly
does so under circumstances in which the individual has a
reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(b) In this section -
(1) the term "capture", with respect to an image, means to
videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast;
(2) the term "broadcast" means to electronically transmit a
visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or
persons;
(3) the term "a private area of the individual" means the naked
or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female
breast of that individual;
(4) the term "female breast" means any portion of the female
breast below the top of the areola; and
(5) the term "under circumstances in which that individual has
a reasonable expectation of privacy" means -
(A) circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe
that he or she could disrobe in privacy, without being
concerned that an image of a private area of the individual was
being captured; or
(B) circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe
that a private area of the individual would not be visible to
the public, regardless of whether that person is in a public or
private place.
(c) This section does not prohibit any lawful law enforcement,
correctional, or intelligence activity.
-SOURCE-
(Added Pub. L. 108-495, Sec. 2(a), Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3999.)
-MISC1-
SHORT TITLE OF 2004 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 108-495, Sec. 1, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3999, provided
that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Video
Voyeurism Prevention Act of 2004'."
-End-
The history of this statute may be found at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s108-1301. Note this federal law did not become effective until December 23rd, 2003. My employment with Energen Corporation began during 1983 and continued through September, 1994. Therefore, this law did not apply during this time period. "United States Code" (federal law) during this time period states the following:
-CITE- 18 USC Sec. 5 -EXPCITE- TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 -HEAD- UNITED STATES DEFINED -STATUTE- The term 'United States', as used in this title in a territorial sense, includes all places and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except the Canal Zone.
-CITE- 18 USC Sec. 7 -EXPCITE- TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 -HEAD- Sec. 7. Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States defined. -STATUTE- The term 'special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States', as used in this title, includes: (1) The high seas, any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State, and any vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof, or to any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, when such vessel is within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State.
-CITE- 18 USC Sec. 13 -EXPCITE- TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 -HEAD- Sec. 13. Laws of States adopted for areas within Federal jurisdiction. -STATUTE- (a) Whoever within or upon any of the places now existing or thereafter reserved or acquired as provided in section 7 of this title, is guilty of any act or omission which, although not made punishable by any enactment of Congress, would be punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State, Territory, Possession, or District in which such place is situated, by the laws thereof in force at the time of such act or omission, shall be guilty of a like offense and subject to a like punishment.
-CITE- 18 USC Sec. 2 -EXPCITE- TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 -HEAD- Sec 2. Principles -STATUTE- (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal. -CITE- 18 USC Sec. 3 -EXPCITE- TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 -HEAD- Sec. 3. Accessory after the fact -STATUTE- Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years. -CITE- 18 USC Sec. 4 -EXPCITE- TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 -HEAD- Sec. 4. Misprison of a felony -STATUTE- Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
To repeat:
-CITE- 18 USC Sec. 241 01/07/2011 -EXPCITE- TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I - CRIMES CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS -HEAD- Sec. 241. Conspiracy against rights -STATUTE- If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured - They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Additionally, the "10th Amendment" to "The United States Constitution" states the following:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Therefore if there is not a federal law governing an act, state law governs the act.
Mike Warren had successfully spent at least a couple of years getting Energen Corporation added to the book listing the best places to work in America. After a few months of inaction by Mike Warren, I began to believe that included employee's who wanted to ignore the law. I was convinced that Mike Warren and Kelly were unaware of the entire story in regards to when the illegal surveillance began, and the initial reason for the illegal surveillance. I grew additionally concerned about how Mike Warren intended to resolve a volatile environment as days passed. Without a legal resolution, my life would remain in perpetual danger.
While sitting at my desk I eventually noticed that Kelly was leaving work around my afternoon break time almost everyday. Prior, I only saw Kelly infrequently as I was leaving the break room during my morning break. Someone I previously never crossed paths with, it was after a couple of passing encounters that I concluded who she was. After days of getting my courage up, I decided to bump into Kelly outside the office environment as she was leaving one day and introduce myself. I walked with Kelly two blocks to the parking deck where her car was parked. The conversation went generally well as conversations go when you initially meet someone. After this encounter, I tried as often as possible to run into Kelly to hopefully get our relationship to regular speaking terms. Naturally a woman sincerely interested in marrying me would want the same as well. I sought the safety and job security of an established relationship with an attorney in direct contact with the C.E.O. of the company I worked for. Kelly was very friendly but distant. When I asked her to lunch one day she initially agreed, but later contacted me and told me "not yet". I considered Mike Warren had still not decided on a resolution.
For several weeks I discerned that Roger Dubble was occasionally visiting the FBI office a few blocks away. I had concluded that he was supporting those illegally involved. Like those before him, I was extremely offended that he was passing judgement on my personal life. If he had a problem with something I was doing in the privacy of my home, he could have discussed it with me. Again, common sense told me the reason why he did not.
What was everyone doing in the privacy of their home at Energen Corporation!? Did Energen know!? Did Energen care!? Was it any of their business!?
I had worked for Energen Corporation for over ten years at this point. Roger was aware that there were no complaints to me in regards to my personal life from anyone at Energen Corporation, nor had the illegal perpetrators observed anyone in my personal life complaining to me about anything after approximately nine years of illegal surveillance. I was puzzled why he was talking to the FBI. Considering it was not me committing multiple misdemeanors and felonies, and he was undoubtedly aware of who was, I shrugged it off.
Doug , Mickey, George, and Roger did not like the possibility of Kelly and I getting married. Methods were discussed to keep us apart. They spoke to Kelly about what she saw in me that interested her, and had unsuccessfully tried to get her to change her mind. They hoped Kelly would grow tired of me and lose interest. Therefore, there were multiple indications that Kelly continued to be sincerely interested in marrying me. Kelly had begun spreading the word to some she was in contact with at Energen that there was something about me, but she could not figure out what it was.
I had been conspicuously pursuing a relationship with Kelly for around a month when Roger informed some people within the Information Services Department that George could not determine how I was aware of Kelly's interest in me so he arranged for an FBI agent to place me under surveillance, with their superior surveillance technology (including satellite surveillance), to determine where I was getting my information from. Roger, at the request of Doug, also arranged for a unmarried FBI agent to be assigned to the case that had physical characteristics they had learned would appeal to Kelly in hopes he would cause her to lose interest in me.
I thought - YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, the FBI is helping them out!?...surely the FBI is unaware of what is going on and what has occurred in this case...and after the FBI becomes familiar with this case this long torturous ordeal will come to an end and be legally addressed...everything they get involved in is always addressed in a court of law.
It is important to note that my local police department, or local sheriff's department was not contacted to address any allegations made against me. I believe everyone will agree they are the first call that is made (911) to report a crime of any nature.
Nevertheless, I again eagerly anticipated a definitive lawful reaction from Mike Warren, as well as the FBI.
Again, according to "United States Code" (federal law):
Again, according to the United States Constitution:
After a couple of weeks the FBI agent assigned to the case reported to Roger Dubble that no one was telling me anything, and he thought I was a mind reader. Upon hearing this information, Kelly took the FBI agent seriously enough to begin telling Mike Warren and others at Energen Corporation she communicated to about the case that I had a mind reading gift. Of course contemplation continued about how I was aware of various activities and developments that I should not be aware of based upon the 24/7 surveillance conducted on me.
The FBI agent:
In effect Roger Dubble, in coordination with Mickey Rains, Doug Johnson, and George Parker managed to get an FBI agent, trained to kill, illegally involved in a case to - injure/oppress/threaten/intimidate people with testimony regarding multiple misdemeanors and felony offense's - fabricate a case against me - and encouraged him to start a dating relationship with a woman interested in marrying me that had incriminating evidence against the illegal perpetrators of Energen Corporation. I concluded that Roger Dubble had prior knowledge of a corrupt FBI.
Again, the "United States Code" (federal law) states:
After several more weeks of continuous FBI surveillance, the FBI agent reassured Roger Dubble that no one was telling me anything. Roger Dubble and Mickey Rains created a document, a contract containing statements of chicanery, and a deadline for unlimited objectives for me alone to accomplish. The contract provides evidence of how it was made impossible for me to meet a deadline. I was told by Roger Dubble that if I did not sign the contract, my employment would be terminated. I was given a few days to make a decision.
The contract is a paradox, expressing awareness of my knowledge and abilities worthy of a higher level position, yet threatening to terminate my employment because of a lack of knowledge and abilities worthy of my current position. Keep in mind Micky Rains and Roger Dubble were among those at Energen Corporation whom were aware that I had been diagnosed by a company appointed psychiatrist as being delusional and psychotic around two years prior to the date on the contract. I refused to sign it and pointed out to him that no other Alagasco employee was required to sign a contract of this nature. Roger Dubble told me my job was terminated, my belongings would be shipped to me, and I was escorted out of the building after nearly eleven years of employment at Alagasco.
Below is a copy of the contract:
I did not believe that C.E.O. William Michael Warren, Jr. would allow lawless Energen perpetrators to terminate my employment. Kelly was continuing to surveil me in the work environment, still expressing her desire to marry me despite the FBI agent trying to convince her to give him a chance to make her happy. Since Roger Dubble arranged for the meeting with me to discuss the contract in a location at Energen Corporation headquarters away from Kelly's surveillance, I telephoned Mike Warren to make sure he was aware of my termination, and to explain the reasons why I refused to sign the document. Mike Warren declined my appeal, and subsequently told Roger Dubble that no one would be allowed to replace me until I found employment elsewhere. According to Mike Warren, that was fair.
Roger Dubble had informed Mike Warren that he had arranged for me to be under FBI surveillance to prevent a legal resolution to this case. Mike Warren allowed Doug Johnson, Micky Rains, George Parker, and everyone else illegally involved in the case to retain their employment without penalty.
What began with Doug Johnson being entertained by watching my personal relationships in the privacy of my home(s) over nine years earlier, had become an Energen Corporation criminal conspiracy to hinder prosecution of the previously stated misdemeanors and felony offense's, with an FBI agent illegally assisting them.
Mike Warren was in a precarious position. If he had fired all the people illegally involved it risked a detrimental effect upon the daily operations of Alagasco's information processing. Fire one person, risk possible lawsuits and criminal charges that he obviously concluded would not happen with an FBI agent illegally involved.
I received a severance allowance that included remaining on payroll for nearly four more months, and the services of an outplacement firm to assist me with seeking employment elsewhere. So with a corrupt FBI agent surveilling me twenty-four hours, seven days a week, I was provided the opportunity to attend Drake, Beem, & Moran, a firm to assist me with finding a job elsewhere to continue my career. 'Under FBI Surveillance' is not something anyone wants to add to a resume. Even if I could find employment, I did not believe I would remain employed very long due to the FBI agent.
I telephoned Kelly Dickenson and asked her for a date. She declined.
I had additional reasons to be in fear for my life.
While attending Drake, Beem, & Moran I discerned that Kelly was continuing to keep up with my actions, continuing to remain in contact with the FBI agent. It was somewhat reassuring. I wondered why Kelly, being an attorney who was expressing a desire to marry me, had not arranged for a lawsuit to be filed already. As time passed it became obvious Kelly was more subservient to Mike Warren than she was interested in marrying me.
During my job search I was informed that someone I have known since childhood was a supervisor in the computer programming department at SouthTrust Bank. After an interview, I was hired by SouthTrust Bank on December 14th, 1994.
Energen Corporation had been using SouthTrust Bank for the corporate banking services.
I look forward to your comments, opinions, etc. on the facebook page
"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness". Remember, this is your hard earned money i.e. your tax dollars being spent on this case.
Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Therefore if there is not a federal law governing an act, state law governs the act.
Mike Warren had successfully spent at least a couple of years getting Energen Corporation added to the book listing the best places to work in America. After a few months of inaction by Mike Warren, I began to believe that included employee's who wanted to ignore the law. I was convinced that Mike Warren and Kelly were unaware of the entire story in regards to when the illegal surveillance began, and the initial reason for the illegal surveillance. I grew additionally concerned about how Mike Warren intended to resolve a volatile environment as days passed. Without a legal resolution, my life would remain in perpetual danger.
While sitting at my desk I eventually noticed that Kelly was leaving work around my afternoon break time almost everyday. Prior, I only saw Kelly infrequently as I was leaving the break room during my morning break. Someone I previously never crossed paths with, it was after a couple of passing encounters that I concluded who she was. After days of getting my courage up, I decided to bump into Kelly outside the office environment as she was leaving one day and introduce myself. I walked with Kelly two blocks to the parking deck where her car was parked. The conversation went generally well as conversations go when you initially meet someone. After this encounter, I tried as often as possible to run into Kelly to hopefully get our relationship to regular speaking terms. Naturally a woman sincerely interested in marrying me would want the same as well. I sought the safety and job security of an established relationship with an attorney in direct contact with the C.E.O. of the company I worked for. Kelly was very friendly but distant. When I asked her to lunch one day she initially agreed, but later contacted me and told me "not yet". I considered Mike Warren had still not decided on a resolution.For several weeks I discerned that Roger Dubble was occasionally visiting the FBI office a few blocks away. I had concluded that he was supporting those illegally involved. Like those before him, I was extremely offended that he was passing judgement on my personal life. If he had a problem with something I was doing in the privacy of my home, he could have discussed it with me. Again, common sense told me the reason why he did not.
What was everyone doing in the privacy of their home at Energen Corporation!? Did Energen know!? Did Energen care!? Was it any of their business!?
I had worked for Energen Corporation for over ten years at this point. Roger was aware that there were no complaints to me in regards to my personal life from anyone at Energen Corporation, nor had the illegal perpetrators observed anyone in my personal life complaining to me about anything after approximately nine years of illegal surveillance. I was puzzled why he was talking to the FBI. Considering it was not me committing multiple misdemeanors and felonies, and he was undoubtedly aware of who was, I shrugged it off.
....Is An Oncoming Train
Doug , Mickey, George, and Roger did not like the possibility of Kelly and I getting married. Methods were discussed to keep us apart. They spoke to Kelly about what she saw in me that interested her, and had unsuccessfully tried to get her to change her mind. They hoped Kelly would grow tired of me and lose interest. Therefore, there were multiple indications that Kelly continued to be sincerely interested in marrying me. Kelly had begun spreading the word to some she was in contact with at Energen that there was something about me, but she could not figure out what it was.
I had been conspicuously pursuing a relationship with Kelly for around a month when Roger informed some people within the Information Services Department that George could not determine how I was aware of Kelly's interest in me so he arranged for an FBI agent to place me under surveillance, with their superior surveillance technology (including satellite surveillance), to determine where I was getting my information from. Roger, at the request of Doug, also arranged for a unmarried FBI agent to be assigned to the case that had physical characteristics they had learned would appeal to Kelly in hopes he would cause her to lose interest in me.
It is important to note that my local police department, or local sheriff's department was not contacted to address any allegations made against me. I believe everyone will agree they are the first call that is made (911) to report a crime of any nature.
Nevertheless, I again eagerly anticipated a definitive lawful reaction from Mike Warren, as well as the FBI.
Again, according to "United States Code" (federal law):
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 241 01/07/2011
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS
-HEAD-
Sec. 241. Conspiracy against rights
-STATUTE-
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any
right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of
the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;
or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the
premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free
exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in
violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an
attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life,
or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Again, according to the United States Constitution:
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868.
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of
the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor deny
to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws.
After a couple of weeks the FBI agent assigned to the case reported to Roger Dubble that no one was telling me anything, and he thought I was a mind reader. Upon hearing this information, Kelly took the FBI agent seriously enough to begin telling Mike Warren and others at Energen Corporation she communicated to about the case that I had a mind reading gift. Of course contemplation continued about how I was aware of various activities and developments that I should not be aware of based upon the 24/7 surveillance conducted on me. The FBI agent:
- Obtained from George Parker all the people he had spoken to illegally about my personal life inside and outside the work environment. The FBI agent fraudulently convinced those with testimony that a legal investigation was being conducted on me and under threat of arrest they could not provide any evidence to me regarding what they had been informed from him or anyone associated with Energen Corporation.
- The FBI agent removed Kelly from her illegal surveillance responsibility (conducted outside the work environment), and told her that he would keep her up to date about my activities. The FBI agent began asking Kelly out for dates, asking her to give him a chance to make her happy, telling her that he was a better man than I was. Kelly rejected his advances (in this regard), continued to express her desire to marry me, but maintained a relationship with him to allow her to stay informed about my activities as per instructions from Mike Warren.
In effect Roger Dubble, in coordination with Mickey Rains, Doug Johnson, and George Parker managed to get an FBI agent, trained to kill, illegally involved in a case to - injure/oppress/threaten/intimidate people with testimony regarding multiple misdemeanors and felony offense's - fabricate a case against me - and encouraged him to start a dating relationship with a woman interested in marrying me that had incriminating evidence against the illegal perpetrators of Energen Corporation. I concluded that Roger Dubble had prior knowledge of a corrupt FBI.
Again, the "United States Code" (federal law) states:
-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 242
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS
-HEAD-
Sec. 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
-STATUTE-
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being
an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed
for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or
an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned
for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to
death.
Also:
-CITE-
42 USC Sec. 14141
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
CHAPTER 136 - VIOLENT CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
SUBCHAPTER IX - STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Part B - Police Pattern or Practice
-HEAD-
Sec. 14141. Cause of action
-STATUTE-
(a) Unlawful conduct
It shall be unlawful for any governmental authority, or any agent
thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental
authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law
enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any
governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of
juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives
persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected
by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
(b) Civil action by Attorney General
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe
that a violation of paragraph (a) has occurred, the Attorney
General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil
action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to
eliminate the pattern or practice.
After several more weeks of continuous FBI surveillance, the FBI agent reassured Roger Dubble that no one was telling me anything. Roger Dubble and Mickey Rains created a document, a contract containing statements of chicanery, and a deadline for unlimited objectives for me alone to accomplish. The contract provides evidence of how it was made impossible for me to meet a deadline. I was told by Roger Dubble that if I did not sign the contract, my employment would be terminated. I was given a few days to make a decision.
The contract is a paradox, expressing awareness of my knowledge and abilities worthy of a higher level position, yet threatening to terminate my employment because of a lack of knowledge and abilities worthy of my current position. Keep in mind Micky Rains and Roger Dubble were among those at Energen Corporation whom were aware that I had been diagnosed by a company appointed psychiatrist as being delusional and psychotic around two years prior to the date on the contract. I refused to sign it and pointed out to him that no other Alagasco employee was required to sign a contract of this nature. Roger Dubble told me my job was terminated, my belongings would be shipped to me, and I was escorted out of the building after nearly eleven years of employment at Alagasco.
Below is a copy of the contract:
I did not believe that C.E.O. William Michael Warren, Jr. would allow lawless Energen perpetrators to terminate my employment. Kelly was continuing to surveil me in the work environment, still expressing her desire to marry me despite the FBI agent trying to convince her to give him a chance to make her happy. Since Roger Dubble arranged for the meeting with me to discuss the contract in a location at Energen Corporation headquarters away from Kelly's surveillance, I telephoned Mike Warren to make sure he was aware of my termination, and to explain the reasons why I refused to sign the document. Mike Warren declined my appeal, and subsequently told Roger Dubble that no one would be allowed to replace me until I found employment elsewhere. According to Mike Warren, that was fair.
Roger Dubble had informed Mike Warren that he had arranged for me to be under FBI surveillance to prevent a legal resolution to this case. Mike Warren allowed Doug Johnson, Micky Rains, George Parker, and everyone else illegally involved in the case to retain their employment without penalty.
What began with Doug Johnson being entertained by watching my personal relationships in the privacy of my home(s) over nine years earlier, had become an Energen Corporation criminal conspiracy to hinder prosecution of the previously stated misdemeanors and felony offense's, with an FBI agent illegally assisting them.
Mike Warren was in a precarious position. If he had fired all the people illegally involved it risked a detrimental effect upon the daily operations of Alagasco's information processing. Fire one person, risk possible lawsuits and criminal charges that he obviously concluded would not happen with an FBI agent illegally involved.
I received a severance allowance that included remaining on payroll for nearly four more months, and the services of an outplacement firm to assist me with seeking employment elsewhere. So with a corrupt FBI agent surveilling me twenty-four hours, seven days a week, I was provided the opportunity to attend Drake, Beem, & Moran, a firm to assist me with finding a job elsewhere to continue my career. 'Under FBI Surveillance' is not something anyone wants to add to a resume. Even if I could find employment, I did not believe I would remain employed very long due to the FBI agent.
I telephoned Kelly Dickenson and asked her for a date. She declined.
I had additional reasons to be in fear for my life.
Moving On
While attending Drake, Beem, & Moran I discerned that Kelly was continuing to keep up with my actions, continuing to remain in contact with the FBI agent. It was somewhat reassuring. I wondered why Kelly, being an attorney who was expressing a desire to marry me, had not arranged for a lawsuit to be filed already. As time passed it became obvious Kelly was more subservient to Mike Warren than she was interested in marrying me.
During my job search I was informed that someone I have known since childhood was a supervisor in the computer programming department at SouthTrust Bank. After an interview, I was hired by SouthTrust Bank on December 14th, 1994.
Energen Corporation had been using SouthTrust Bank for the corporate banking services.
To Be Continued....Somewhere
I look forward to your comments, opinions, etc. on the facebook page
"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness". Remember, this is your hard earned money i.e. your tax dollars being spent on this case.
No comments:
Post a Comment